travisthornton.net

Documenting history as it happens.

Monthly Archives: January 2008

Letter to Congress

0 Comments

The following letter was sent to Senators Hutchison and Cornyn, and Representatives Poe, Paul, and Brady, after the President’s 2008 State of the Union Address: 

 

With a looming national recession apparent, the Congress has decided to write Americans a bonus check.  I am sure there are many plans and ideas that are going to be pushed into this “Economic Stimulus Package” that are inevitably going to bog down the legislative system.  I regrettably offer some additional ideas that, with a little effort, could be relevant at this crucial point.  These particular ideas, however, are different than most, as these are actions the government could feasibly undertake to assist the economy by taking action from outside the market, where government belongs.

1 – Freeze the upcoming federal minimum wage hikes.  Parts of the inflation problems are due to a stepping rise in the minimum wage; this plan marks the fastest way to devalue the American dollar.  Currently at $5.85 per hour, the minimum wage is set to increase 70 cents in July 2008, and 70 more cents in July 2009 for a total of $7.25 an hour.  These increases have been proven to hurt small business, lower competitiveness and quality of work in the United States, while it moves jobs offshore to avoid U.S. tax codes and federal minimum wage regulations.  Most states have a minimum wage requirement equal to or greater than the federal mandate.  Reversing the federal law and thereby giving control of this issue to the states will help states maintain their own inflation problems and standard of living issues, instead of subjecting states to some federal standard. 

2 – Balance the federal budget.  Fiscal responsibility has always been a conservative ideal, but has recently become lost in the fray.  No new spending should be voted upon until it can be legitimately paid for in the national budget.  This is a truth many families face, and they are expected to maintain a fiscally responsible budget while paying their debts.  As of late, there has been no example set forth by the federal government to encourage mature monetary actions among the American people.  Ironically, the checks most Americans will be receiving as part of an “Economic Stimulus Package” will not do the economy any good if a family uses it responsibly, and pays off their own debts.  Instead, we will be encouraged to “get out and spend it,” which is inherently irresponsible considering the average American family’s credit card debt is over $9600.  Paradoxically, the money being given back to taxpayers was taken from taxpayers in the first place, while promoting the uniform distribution of wealth, and entitlements over incentives.

3 – Support clean energy Research and Development.  While this will require money from the federal coffers, this was key to the Founders’ Intent for our government’s purpose as indicated in Article I, Section 8, of the U.S. Constitution, which promotes the progress of science and the arts.  A domestic investment in energy science, including so-called “green collar” industries, will stimulate the economy, generate jobs, and relax our foreign policy woes in the Middle East.  There are many ways to achieve small goals, all which would benefit through increased Research and Development; I will name a few.  Currently, nuclear power only accounts for 20% of our nation’s energy source, while in France, the burden of coal and oil has been lifted by providing 80% of their energy from nuclear power.  A study by the RAND Corporation shows that increasing our electrical and fuel energy to 25% by 2025 from renewable sources, such as ethanol and bio-diesel, would in turn produce $700 billion of new economic activity and five million new jobs.  The United States spends over $200,000 a minute on foreign oil and accounts for 25% of the global oil consumption, a fraction of which would stimulate growth in the United States, instead of the Middle East.  The demand for oil will continue to grow nationally and internationally, making it more difficult to maintain a congruent foreign policy with the world, as we put our economy in a hostage situation with key players in the Middle East; currently, 97% of our nation’s transportation relies on foreign oil.  Sadly, our government invests roughly $3.5 billion a year in Research and Development.  The Microsoft Corporation spends over $7 billion on R&D, through which their company has grown in leaps and bounds. 

There are ways to stop the “stagflation” our economy faces.  The challenge will be to promote incentives to economic growth, instead of perpetuating entitlements and subsidies, or borrowing from ourselves to pay ourselves.  I believe the conservative ideas discussed will stimulate the economy.  Rewarding responsibility within the American economy will generate the growth necessary to boost the free market. 

Share on Facebook
Filed under Environment, News
Jan 29, 2008

Making the Hard Call

1 Comment

Today I found a Post-It note from this Summer, upon which I had scribbled the following:

I cannot support a candidate for President who would:
a)  Say, without a doubt, that global warming is not real.
b)  “Just pull out” of Iraq.
c)  Say that he or she would not raise taxes to lower our national debt.
d)  Support universal health insurance.

I guess “b” and “d” exclude a certain party, now doesn’t it?  After watching tonight’s Las Vegas Democratic Debate, there are a couple of additional excluders to add to that list.  Ruling out nuclear power as a pragmatic energy option to meet American demand is ludicrous.  Raising ther federal minimum wage also defies logic.  I can think of a no more quicker or decisive way to devalue our dollar.  Most public policy issues raised tonight did nothing more than to rapidly perpetuate the Nanny State. 

Tonight, in their lurching toward a “universal” social welfare state, their blatant confusion over the energy crisis, and their complete and unified desertion of reasonable foreign policy, I was afraid.  Let me invoke Ronald Reagan, circa 1964, who in the height of the Cold War said, “There is no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there is only one guaranteed way you can have peace–and you can have it in the next second–surrender… You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery… You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.  We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.”

There are, however, others running for President, and not on the Dark Side mentioned above.  There are some that are doing well, with a well-constructed platform, pandering to the Neo-conservatives, whose policies are based on illegitamite populism.  For instance, what do some say to do with 10 to 20 million illegal immigrants?  What makes sense?  Furthermore, what do some candidates say about stimulating the economy?  What makes sense?  Is the candidate elected President of the Economy?  What say does the President have over the state of the economy?  What do these candidates say in the realm of possibility?

This Summer, when I wrote on that Post-It note, John McCain was down and out.  He revealed he can hire, and fire, the appropriate people to achieve the mission.  His campaign is based on principle, not on pandering.  As he said early on, “He would rather lose the Presidency than lose this war.”  This Presidency; this “bully pulpit” soon available, will determine an alternate course in the history of this nation.  Which way will it go?  Who has been willing to say the hard things, and not just the pretty things?

mccain0508.jpg

McCAIN 2008

Share on Facebook
Filed under Defense, News
Jan 16, 2008

The Race is On

0 Comments

The Presidential race for Democratic frontrunner is reminiscent, at least to me, of a certain competition that took place forty years ago.  The more experienced politician, who had many more political ties had to drop from the race, as it seemed the younger man in the race was more able to ignite a nation.

phones.JPG

Mrs. Clinton has questioned Mr. Obama’s oratory power, saying oration lacks the substance of action.  I would agree with this.  Action is like water while speech is like air; when water leaves a nozzle, it falls faster as it descends, covering more and is able to have a greater impact at the ground level.  Although air from a nozzle may be louder than water, it dissipates and loses its strength as it fills a space, with little impact on the ground.

crowds.JPG

What Mrs. Clinton has failed to understand, however, is the power of principle.  While she may speak of action, it seems she lacks the principle behind her statements.  This is also true of the robotic Mitt Romney, whos is constructed by advisors, funded by personal millions, and is pandering to a Neocon/Theocon sentiment in the Republican Party.  Obama has a certain fire in his belly, but in my opinion, John McCain has more, and his sentiment is founded on principle.  Principle will bring answers to life’s toughest questions, where advisors will fail.  Principle will withstand courage under fire, when populism gives way.  Principle will extend grace when needed, and exhibit strength when required.

nh01.jpg

Congratulations to John McCain for his win in New Hampshire; let this be my official endorsement of a true American hero.

Share on Facebook
Filed under News
Jan 10, 2008

On Kyoto

0 Comments

Questions about Protocol, Kyoto and otherwise, from Continental Airlines Flight 2780, non-stop service from Houston, Texas, to Norfolk, Virginia:

From above we watch a changing hue
As the white melts the green to blue;
We observe ourselves, six billion strong
and wonder where it all went wrong?

We regulate ourselves and then
At home, the same patterns over again;
How do we manage the whole world’s demands
while We, the People sit in the stands?

At Genesis we were given the Earth
and we’ve taken it for all it’s worth;
As the Earth’s color changes, how can we
Accelerate an eventual epiphany?

Share on Facebook
Filed under Environment, Personal
Jan 7, 2008

Discovering My Perspective

All of my past posts are archived below. Feel free to comment to any post by clicking the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.

I have no rights to the photos used herein. Most were found online through a simple Google search. If a copyright issue exists, please message me and I will eradicate the problem. Thank you!

My Twitterfeed

Follow @travisthornton on twitter.

Categories