travisthornton.net

Documenting history as it happens.

Author Archives: Travis

Improving Monetary Policy

1 Comment

I submitted this article entitled “Ending the Fed: A New Monetary Policy”  to the Wall Street Journal today, in which I make this proposal public for the first time.

In the Wall Street Journal, April 26, George Melloan discussed recent congressional zeal in confronting the Federal Reserve.  He addresses two bills currently in the House: Rep. Kevin Brady’s Sound Dollar Act (H.R. 4180); and Rep. Ron Paul’s Free Competition in Currency Act (H.R. 1098).

Mr. Melloan praises the Sound Dollar Act, which would eliminate the pursuit of full employment from the dual mandate – that is, maintaining full employment and price stability – given the Federal Reserve in 1978.

This would allow the Federal Reserve to concentrate on a singular mission – price stability – in hopes that reforming the mission of the Federal Reserve, and strengthening the regional banks’ voting rights in Federal Open Market Committee meetings, could rein in government spending and reduce the rate of addition to the monetary supply.

A singular focus on price stability is problematic, however, as the Federal Reserve itself may be misguided on the very definition of price stability.  At the Congressional committee hearing on February 29, 2012, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated:

“There are two definitions of the Dollar: One is the buying power, that is the inflation rate in the United States: ‘Does the dollar today buy more than it did yesterday?’  The other definition is, the Dollar versus other currencies – the foreign exchange value of the Dollar.  Those are two separate concepts.”

Mr. Bernanke believes that on both accounts, the Federal Reserve is “doing okay.”

But the buying power of the Dollar is anything but “okay.”  The excess printing of money, albeit electronic in nature, has led to increased devaluation of the US Dollar.  While core inflation – that is, inflation minus energy and food prices – is reported at 2%, we experienced 9% inflation on grocery items in 2011.

Comparing the Dollar to foreign currencies is a little trickier, as the United States enjoys the Dollar’s global reserve currency status.  In the wake of the financial crisis of 2008, the Dollar strengthened as the world flocked to US Treasuries as a safe haven.  Additionally, half of every currency note traded in our globalized economy – which is completely dependent on fiat monetary systems – is a US Dollar.  While core inflation of the Dollar may be low, return rates on savings and investments are lower, resulting in a “negative real interest rate,” thus discouraging saving.

Rep. Paul’s bill – which Mr. Melloan calls “radical” – strikes at the very heart of fiat Dollar hegemony.  Make no mistake: Rep. Paul’s bill is designed to undermine the fiat system and usher in the next gold era.  While I favor a gold standard to fiat currency, it has been weak in practice, as it is vulnerable to exploitation in international finance.  The Long Depression, the Great Depression, and the failure of the Bretton Woods system render examples of exploitation, whether by foreign or domestic governments.

The world is now exclusively on a fiat standard, which in the course of history has always failed, and I believe, will fail again.

So if both fiat and gold standards are flawed, the question, then, is how to restrict expansion of the monetary base in a manner that cannot be exploited in a globalized economy.  I propose a population-based monetary system, in which, the money supply could only increase by the percentage our population increases, creating essentially a “dollars-per-capita” system.

A population-based monetary system would eliminate inflation by:

1. Behaving as a commodity-based system without the dangers of exploitation.  This system would achieve price stability for our “needs,” which are often in static markets, whereas the prices of “wants” could fluctuate;

2.  Restoring a sound dollar, returning the prices of goods and services to the forces of supply and demand within a free market system, and ultimately, eliminating the need for a Federal Reserve;

3. Forcing a balanced budget by placing a much-needed singular fiscal restriction on our government, currently borrowing 40 cents for every dollar it spends.  Our nation could then focus on economic sustainability and restoring our balance of trade.

Maybe most attractive, moving to a population-based system could happen immediately, if we could summon the political will, as a nation, to live debt-free.

Share on Facebook
Filed under Ideology
May 1, 2012

What’s Up With These Gas Prices?

0 Comments

Rising gas prices are beginning to “shock” American consumers.  In response, America is left wondering “why,” and the media generates all sorts of answers, few of which - Peggy Noonan notwithstanding - are true.  The chart below shows what has happened in the past 36 months, roughly the period since Obama has been in office:

While factors such as the geopolitics of Iran’s oil embargo, Obama’s banning of the Keystone Pipeline, and oil speculation are effecting the price, but these reasons are not totally to blame.  The truth is, the price of oil has been climbing steadily for more than a decade now, although supply and demand have been relatively constant.

What we are witnessing is the decline of fiat currency, and this is having a direct effect on the price of oil.  In this post, I will try to show why, using a deluge of charts.  The price of oil is increasing as denominated by paper currency, like the Euro and the USD.  Denominated by gold, the price has stayed constant.  Below shows the how oil has trended in Euros, Dollars, and gold; if you remember any of these charts, this should be it:

The sharp increase in the money supply through Treasury Bond sales is the primary driver for both oil and gold prices.  Inflation of prices occurs due to dilution of the currency:

Oil and gold are commodities treated like currency, because they have inherent value that fiat currency does not.  Over a longer term, commodities are more of a “money” than fiat currencies are.

Increasing the monetary supply is achieved by the issuance and repurchase of bonds.  Bonds are treated like assets on either side of the transaction; what is really a liability is treated as an asset on balance sheets:

Monetizing our debt is no recent phenomenon, but the measures the Federal Reserve has gone to in order to keep interest rates low are historic.  Low interest rates have not spurred economic growth; in this regard, do not confuse “market” with “economy.”  In real terms (as opposed to nominal), interest rates in the US are negative, as rates of return are not keeping up with inflation.  These low interest rates discourage saving and encourage spending, at both the individual and government levels, thereby enabling debt accumulation:

Another historic Fed policy is the record purchase of assets - including Treasury Bonds - known as Quantitative Easing.  As I noted last month, through QE1 and QE2) the Federal Reserve has surpassed China as the largest holder of US debt.  We are now our now both lender and debtor to ourselves.  As the maturation of these bonds would flood the market with money and dilute the USD faster, the Fed began a policy of extending the maturation dates of these Treasury Bonds with purchases of new Treasury Bonds.  This enabled a faster pace of debt financing: the Federal Reserve has purchased 91% of 20 and 30-year Treasury Bonds at auction since Operation Twist began in September:

China is, for the most part, out of the US Treasury Bond market as of December:

China is, however, buying gold:

So what happened in December?  To “help” with the European debt crisis the Federal Reserve guaranteed “unlimited” currency swaps to other world central banks, most notably the ECB.  While we issue cash to Europe, we enable them to increase debt issuance by financing its insolvent member nations.  Therefore, global debt has increased exponentially in efforts to right the very world economies fiat currency has destroyed.  Inflation is being hidden on the world’s central banks’ balance sheets in a Bond Bubble, which will pop at maturation.

The Fed is not alone: nearly $7 trillion has been pumped by global central banks into the world stock markets just in the past 4 years.  The aggregate global central bank balance sheet has doubled in four years, after doubling in the 5 years before thatThe central banks have injected $2 trillion in the past four months alone.

As long as this continues, fiat currency will continue its decline.

Commodities like oil and gold don’t behave like fiat currency, as they have inherent value.  As this is hard to explain to the average America consumer, blaming Iran, Keystone, or speculation is the easy way out.  War with Iran, however, won’t solve the problem; neither will building a pipeline, or banning speculation.  As long as debt is monetized to compensate for overspending, and more debt is created (whether through bailouts, stimulus, or bond issuance) to alleviate the effects of inflation created by overspending, this will continue, as more debt cannot solve the debt problem.

Today, the US Dollar suffered its biggest drop in a month.  The upward trend in the price of oil will continue until the world’s monetary rules are rewritten after global fiat currency spirals out of control – as history shows it always does.  This is my greatest fear, as hyperinflation is usually followed by confusion, chaos, revolution, and war.

Which is why I’m not so sure the recent focus on Iran is no mistake after all.

Share on Facebook
Filed under Environment
Feb 24, 2012

Mistakes with Iran

0 Comments

The following piece was submitted to various newspapers for print; I’m squeezing it in onto the website now, as it fits between two other related pieces. Enjoy.

Every four years, during the presidential debate season, the Islamic Republic of Iran re-enters the American political spectrum. Conservatives are pressuring the President to act in order to disrupt the rekindling Iranian nuclear capability. It is prudent to review the history of the Iranian regime to properly understand the situation we now face, and the dangers of callous actions.

Founded in 1979, the former Persian Empire became an anti-American theocratic regime under the rule of Ayatollah Khomeini, and a handful of mullahs, when the Iranian people overthrew the monarch Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, who in 1953 had been installed as Prime Minister to continue providing cheap oil to the British, Iran’s former colonial ruler.

Iran was further aggravated by American support of the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein during the eight-year Iraq-Iran War. Fifteen years later, as the world’s largest Shiite nation, Iran was emboldened by the American toppling of the Sunni Ba’athist Party during the 2003 Iraq War.

Since 2004, Iran has appeared to be the imminent national security threat, as it has led a “Shia Revival,” extending to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Violent Islamism – and the vehement Anti-Semitic language that accompanied it – did not sit well with the Iranian people: In 2009, the moderate Iranian public showed their disdain for their extremist regime by protesting the fraudulent presidential election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Some protestors gave their lives in the struggle.

During this period of opportunity, American officials largely sat silent.

Today, America faces a renewed threat, with a more desperate Iranian regime.

Although Iran has not initiated a military strike against another nation since it was under British rule, given the recent plot to kill the Saudi Ambassador on US soil, last month’s hijacking of a US Drone, and the likely Iranian assassination of a Houstonian student last week, the threat is real. Our actions today, however, are counterintuitive to toppling the regime; furthermore, conservatives are making critical errors in pushing Obama to action with Iran.

Our first mistake is imposing massive economic sanctions, crippling not the regime, but the entire nation. The EU recently joined the US in these efforts, with the EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton saying: “The pressure of sanctions is designed to try and make sure that Iran takes seriously our request to come to the table.”

The financial embargo is destroying Iran’s currency, and their gasoline imports have been cut in half. These actions do not accomplish the goal of stopping the Iranian regime; in fact, we are arbitrarily turning those moderates who protested Ahmadinejad toward their regime, and away from us. When an embargo becomes a blockade, sanctions become an act of war. Make no mistake: Forced starvation will lead to aggression. We are essentially radicalizing an enemy.

Our second mistake is confusing what is acceptable from the Iranians, and what is not. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has explicitly stated the Iranians are not developing a nuclear weapon, but are pursuing a nuclear capability. It is understood that an Iranian nuclear capability could pose a threat to Israel, but we have not specified whether or not Iran’s return to nuclear energy – which they had until 1979 – is acceptable. A nuclear weapon in the hands of this particular regime would be a threat to our national security, whereas nuclear power is not.

Furthermore, Iranian naval exercises in the Persian Gulf have riled Defense officials.

In direct retaliation against sanctions, the Iranian regime – as of this writing – has sworn to “definitely” block traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. I understand the seriousness of the situation; in the US Navy, I drove a $5 billion warship through that Strait, was followed by the Iranian missile silos ashore, P-3 aircraft overhead, and coastal patrol vessels afloat, and can attest it is a contentious area, through which roughly 25 percent of the world’s oil flows.

Iran’s closing of the Strait in response to a blockade would indeed be an act of war, and would require action. A hasty counterstrike, however, would lead to an asymmetric and chaotic naval war. The Revolutionary Guard commander Brigadier General Jafaari has threatened: “The enemy is far more advanced technologically than we are, we have been using what is called asymmetric warfare methods… our forces are now well prepared for it.”

Irregular war with Iran poses the largest threat to our ally Israel. While the Arab Spring was promoted by the Obama Administration – and emboldened the Administration’s circumvention of the Congress in warfare – it destabilized Israel. Defense Secretary Panetta has warned an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear sites would be “catastrophic” to the region. I disagree. A true friend to Israel would back off and let Israel take care of itself. With over 300 nuclear warheads of its own and the best intelligence agency in the world, Israel should be allowed to act in sovereignty and in accordance with its own national security.

It is unclear whether the United States has the resources, or if the American public has the willpower, to escalate to another war, without being struck first. It is clear, however, that our federal government is actually inviting war with Iran; that is why we deliberately confuse our “red lines.” That is why we restrain Israel. That is why we are provoking Iran, to incite them to act first, in order to generate instant American support for another war.

Why would our government want a war with Iran? The reasons are simple.

When asked what the greatest threat to American national security is, former JCS Chairman ADM Mike Mullen said not Iran – nor any other nation – but our national debt. Because the federal government lacks both the willpower to cut government spending and the capacity to tax the American public any further, it is preparing to hyperinflate our way out of this financial mess. Doing so will destroy what is left of the US Dollar, which is in a downward spiral, as the world slowly gives up on it as reserve currency.

This week, India dumped the US Dollar for gold in purchasing Iranian oil; a week earlier, Russia did the same. To understand why the world is abandoning the Dollar, it is critical to note that while the price of a barrel of oil is high, it has remained constant compared to the position the US Dollar holds to gold. The Dollar has been devalued by 95 percent since the 1913 advent of the Federal Reserve, which now holds the majority of US Treasury bonds.

Engaging in war with Iran would shroud the Fed’s actions while the maturation of these bonds destroys that final 5 percent, enabling a transition to a global currency and monetary standard progressives have wanted for decades.

If you are still not convinced the federal government would welcome war with Iran, consider this: Since James Madison, no wartime President has lost reelection. War with Iran ensures four more years of President Obama’s social control and class warfare. Obama will pretend as though he doesn’t want war with Iran, up until the point he must act, which I would wager to guess would be around October of 2012.

History teaches that free trade and the advancement of ideas would spur the people of Iran to topple their own regime. Irregular war with Iran would come at the expense of the American soldier and the Iranian citizen, while the Iranian regime could escape unscathed. Conservatives must consider the consequences of pushing the President to reelection and plunging the nation into another war.

Share on Facebook
Filed under Defense
Jan 26, 2012

The Importance of Monetary Freedom

1 Comment

To understand the scope of our economic crisis, we must understand the degree of departure from sound money.  The American economy was founded upon the idea of natural law, actually, where the free exchange of goods and services occurred in the marketplace.  The father of capitalism, Adam Smith, called this the “obvious and simple system of natural liberty.”  An obvious and simple economic system requires an obvious and simple currency; I generally believe precious metals are ordained as currency, as these elements have little industrial superiority over others, other than their perceived inherent value.  All Western empires grew based on sound currency - the US Dollar, the British Pound (and silver Sterling), and the Roman Aureus (and silver Denarius) - and subsequently died when they departed from the set standard.

Like the British and Roman empires, America departed from an obvious and simple system, adopted a fiat currency, and embarked on a journey which placed democracy before freedom.  In all things, spreading the costs and minimizing the risks dampens rewards, as profits are smaller, and produces little incentive to succeed; social democratization of our institutions undermines natural liberty.  Our monetary system and our fiscal policy are not exempt from the laws of nature.

History of the Crisis

Business cycles in the market are as normal as the consumer trends – or “animal spirits” – that keep it afloat.  Realizing this, our founders established a dollar as equal to 371.25 grains of fine silver; this economic law was adopted by the Continental Congress in 1787 and formally signed into law as the Mint Act of 1792 by President George Washington.  This effectively tied the hands of the US Mint by prohibiting the printing of money not backed by silver.

Over time, this law was altered to accept gold – and occasionally, foreign currency – in place of silver, effectively providing currency competition within our borders.  America went completely off a precious metal standard from 1863 to 1878 to accommodate spending for the Civil War; we fully instated the Gold Standard in 1900.

But it didn’t last long.  Although more destructive business cycles began with the conception of the Federal Reserve (1913), our modern fiscal crisis began with the Bretton Woods agreement (1944), which established a nominally gold-backed US Dollar as an international monetary standard, managed by the International Monetary Fund.  I say “nominally,” for this standard was susceptible to manipulation:  In 1933, FDR issued Executive Order 6102, which made the possession of gold bullion illegal until 1974.  This confiscation obscured the actual effects a global monetary system - defined at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire – had on the Dollar.

It cannot be emphasized enough how important the Bretton Woods agreement was to world history, and not just for monetary reasons.  Empire status was, for the most part, thrust upon us as a repayment for the blood we shed for our Allied partners in World War II.  Deferring to the International Monetary Fund for control of the Dollar, however, has not aided these partners, as our ignorance of the IMF has allowed for the clandestine support of military dictatorships worldwide with our printing of fiat currency.

From its inception, the Bretton Woods system was doomed to fail:  Over time, the global use of the US Dollar stressed the Gold Standard to the point where we had to abandon it for fiat currency in 1971, which began the Nixon Shocks, and allowed the Treasury to print as much money as it needed, therefore increasing the magnitude of the booms and busts created by the artificially low interest rates held by the Federal Reserve.  Consider the fact that when Nixon announced our departure from the Gold Standard, gold was $40/oz; today it is near $1,700/oz.  Gold is not up; the dollar is down, as a result our debt.  Today, the US Dollar has lost 95% of its purchasing power since the Fed’s inception; that is, a dollar today buys what 5 cents bought in 1913.

Since Bretton Woods, America has assumed the risks of the world: Through wide-scale cost-cutting business practices, we have relied on foreign nations, first for labor, and then for capital by monetizing debt, thereby slowly gutting the workforce, and the the economy.  With our new-found – albeit temporary – wealth, our government approved unsustainable – and untouchable - welfare and warfare states.  Through the maintenance of these empirical federal programs, we are forfeiting the greatest experiment in freedom the world had ever seen.

Mechanics of the Crisis

Because our government has been uwilling to rein in spending, and unable to raise taxes any further on American productivity, it has relied on the Federal Reserve to distribute more money and push interest rates lower for borrowing purposes.  Interest rate manipulation leads to destruction of the economy, in which good people get hurt.  Artificially low interest rates promote banks to lower lending standards, creating malinvestment in the market, which creates a moral hazard for both parties of the transaction.  When the market exposes these investments as flawed, the entire society experiences the bust – that is, the consequences of the actions of a few.  Therefore, through market interference, the Federal Reserve violates the economic liberty of all Americans.

We are taught that prices should slowly rise in a “normal” economy, at a low single-digit annual rate; we are also taught deflation is a bad thing, as if falling prices is harmful.  The price of a particular good should fall until it is improved upon, the way flat screen televisions and Smartphones do.  New products entering the market are priced high and then fall, until they either reach a level of sustainment or exit the market, with annual inflation for the entire economy equal to zero.

For some reason, we don’t expect a gallon of gas, a gallon of milk, a carton of eggs, or a loaf of bread to behave similarly; we somehow expect annual inflation.  Therein the Federal Reserve has perpetrated the greatest conspiracy – unknown to most Americans – that inflation is necessary, when indeed, it is not.  But inflation has a purpose for the political class, for it allows them to spend without limit.

While the American public is focused on rates of taxation, they fail to recognize that overspending is a tax itself.  It does not matter what the tax rate is.  Whether our government taxes, borrows, or inflates the monetary base, the public will pay for its government’s overspending eventually.  By delaying the inevitable, and not addressing our debt drivers – Defense, Social Security, and Medicare – our correction is going to be sharp, and will hurt the savings and investments of millions of good people, while rewarding those in control.

Investment research expert Charles Biderman offers this:

“Debt has to be reckoned with one way or another. It either has to be repaid, or someone has to bear the losses on what cannot be repaid, either through default or inflation and currency debasement. If it were otherwise, everyone could be rich.”

Similarly, but from another angle, the now infamous economist John Maynard Keynes:

“By a continuous process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.  By this method, they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some.”

Is it any wonder we now have billionaire career politicians, considering it is they who write the rules for banking, the stock market, and the economy largesse.  In his controversial new book, Throw Them All Out, Peter Schweizer reports on how the median speculator loses in the options market, while industry insiders beat the market by 5%, hedge fund managers by 8%, and US Senators, astonishingly, by 12%.

With inflation, politicians have fleeced the citizenry of their covert actions; this period of American history may be ending.  Through what psychologists call the normalcy bias, our society believes since an occurrence has not yet occurred, it will never occur.  This fallacy is rampant across demographics: Our large elder generation – “Baby Boomers” – long ago voted themselves welfare-state benefit, is now seeking retirement, and expects to reap their just rewards.  The next generation is riddled with protesters – or protester sympathizers – who demand their generation be shackled with more debt.

So, like the empires before us, we are slowly committing national suicide, with a debt-laden poison pill.

Scope of the Crisis

Both America and the world are buried in debt:  just as America’s debt reached 100% of GDP at $15 trillion last month, the world did the same, at $195 trillion of debt.  To put this in perspective, Carmen Reinhart and Ken Rogoff, the authors of This Time It’s Different (2009), found (by studying 22 global economic crises) that when government debt-to-GDP ratio rises above 90%, it lowers the future potential GDP of a country by at least 1%, and begets a slow-growth, high unemployment economy; our unemployment rate is stuck at the socialist nations’ average of 9%.  After a crisis, public debt soars to an average of 86%, whereas our is, as stated, currently over 100% of GDP.  Nations that cannot pull out of the debt crisis often experience sovereign debt default.  An American default would lead to a collapse of the global currency system.

The source of our debt concerns, deficit-spending, is now an epidemic.  Our last budget surplus occurred during the Clinton Administration, with ballooning debt spiraling out-of-control during the Bush Administration.  Today, a wholesale abandonment of fiscal responsibility has allowed President Obama to run monthly deficits greater than Bush’s annual deficits.  Artificially-low interest rates beget loose lending standards, incentivizing people to make money during the boom, before the “necessary bust” punishes everyone.

We have avoided this bust with Federal Reserve policy, but we are merely delaying the effects, and intensifying the pain to come.  Through “Quantitative Easing” - QE1 and QE2 - the Federal Reserve surpassed China as the majority owner of our Treasury Bonds.  Through a money-laundering scheme, we are both debtor and lender.

With the imminent collapse of the Euro, the world is painfully realizing the facts: the world economy is bankrupt, and the IMF looks to the U.S. to bail out Greece, when, in fact, the U.S. is only one to two decades from becoming Greece.

Conventional wisdom says that when – not if – the Euro collapses, it will strengthen the US Dollar as the world’s reserve currency, as there will be no other global alternative.  I believe the opposite, that the Euro collapse expose the US Dollar as being just as weak as the Euro, as our debt is at similar levels; the bond rates will go up, credit will dry up, business will fail, and prices will rise, thus commencing the global currency crisis some have been predicting for years.

Future of the Crisis

History shows what awaits if we don’t get our debt under control: First, a sharp period of hyperinflation, and then, a sovereign debt default.  With the facade gone, we will also experience a currency collapse, followed by a painful, deliberate return to a precious metal standard.  How this will happen, and who will be controlling it, is yet to be seen.

The collapse of the Roman Empire was predicated by inflation; to combat the effects, Rome used price controls to drive prices below their market value, sapping all profit and killing the economy.  Similarly, the US has monetized and securitized the debt, auctioning cheap Treasury Bonds to overseas bidders to prevent inflationary effects.

Here’s the kicker: Treasury Bonds, seen as assets on multiple nations’ balance sheets, are essentially worthless, for if they were to be leveraged as capital during the collapse, it would further undermine the unit of currency upon which it rests, quickening the collapse.

Contrary to popular belief, the Federal Reserve does not print money to make up the balance; rather, it transfers it electronically, and accordingly, has been able to covertly manipulate markets – both foreign and domestic – for years.  These actions are finally catching up to us.  While Congress approved a $700 billion Bank Bailout, followed by a $700 billion Stimulus, the Federal Reserve was delivering 10 times that amount of cash - $7.77 trillion – to the financial industry through the back door, all in an eight month period.  The total amount of cash lent in the financial crisis was $16 trillion, a truly inconceivable amount of money.  In perspective, $7.77 trillion is more than half the US production capacity last year; GDP in 2011 was a little bit shy of $15 trillion.  I believe this action will be remembered as the “nail-in-the-coffin” for the US Dollar.

What will a currency crisis look like?  As the US Dollar crumbles, we will export our inflation to other nations (as it is the reserve currency of the world), destroy their economies, and create a “Weimar Republic” situation around the world.  How the world will reckon with this is uncertain, but America will receive much of the blame from the rest of the world for its woes.  How will these nations react?  What coalitions will be formed to fill the power vacuum?

Ask yourself:  What happened to the British and Roman Empires when their currency collapsed?  The end of the British Empire brought the First World War in Europe, which eventually precipitated into the Second World War at the end of Germany’s currency crisis.  When the Roman Empire collapsed, the world plunged into a 600-year economic doldrum known as the Dark Ages.  Of course, America wouldn’t let that happen; no, I’m sure we’d go out with a bang.

Alternate History

This could unfurl differently.

By restoring the US Dollar as sound currency, on a precious metal standard, combined with a laissez-faire economic approach – that is, a severe downsizing of our federal government – would let a correction take place, and would be the quickest way to spur innovation in the private sector and unveil a new economy, dependent on individual action, and not the collective.

Of course, a sharp self-correction of this type, like that of 1920-21, would mean a number of firms that could not survive without federal injections of cash would go bankrupt.  A positive externality of wide-scale bankruptcy would mean an influx of skilled labor entering the job force, creating the new economy.  Restoring the US Dollar to a precious metal standard would, in turn, restore confidence in the American monetary system, and would no longer allow our government to destroy the economy and our standards of living with inflation.

As only an extremely slim minority would favor this sharp self-correction, the status quo decides there are only two ways out of this: war or inflation.  I disagree.  Restoring the fundamentals would allow the nation to find the new economy, while allowing competing currencies in the marketplace as not to burden the US Dollar and worsen the impact of recession.

If left alone, the market would rebound and define itself, the way it has centuries before.  From 1750 to 1850, America was an agricultural society; 1850 to 1950 marked the industrial society; and 1950 until now, America has been a technological society.  Our wholesale abandonment of the agricultural and industrial sectors for the technological sector has left us vulnerable, as we are unable sustain our own demand for food or manufacturing.  This situation undermines our national security.  We need to leverage our new technologies into these antiquated sectors, the way oil companies have with oil exploration, or BMW has with automobile production.

Demand is there for new innovations and new approaches, shrouded beneath layers of government intervention and stimuli.  In attempts to choose winners and losers in a market, government destroys entire sectors, a fact I discussed back in October.  The green movement comes to mind: Considering the fact that food travels an average of 1500 miles to get to your plate, and that food travels away from you before it travels toward you, it’s high time to overhaul inefficient supply chains, before the currency crisis empties store shelves faster than they can be restocked.

Ending this mess begins with reinstating sound currency, and ensuring the rest of the world the US Dollar can be trusted again.  Although we haphazardly began our empire with Dollar hegemony, it will take deliberate steps to end it and restore the republic.

That is the choice we now face, as we did in September of 1787:  republic or empire.  It’s important to remember the ominous nature of the answer given when Ms. Powell of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, exiting the Constitutional Convention, “Well Doctor what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?”

Dr Franklin replied: “A republic, if you can keep it.”

It is now ours to restore.

Share on Facebook
Filed under Ideology
Jan 10, 2012

Freedom First

2 Comments

The world misunderstands the relationship between political freedom and democracy.  Even Wikipedia contorts its definition of “political freedom,” saying it is “one of the most important (real or ideal) features of democratic societies.”  The relationship is actually the inverse; political freedom must exist for democracy to withstand the test of time.

Democracy is necessary, but not sufficient, for a free society.  Whether in the Arab Spring or Nazi Germany, democracy was placed before freedom, and look what democracy hath wrought.

A free state, on the other hand, provides legal protection of the civil rights and ensures the free will of its citizens.  These individual rights, seen as “natural,” or given by God, were formalized by John Locke, stating in his 1689 Two Treatises of Government:

“The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.”

This idea – which drove our nation’s founding documents – is based on centuries of work to overthrow tyranny, whether with the Magna Carta in England, 1215, or in 35 A.D, when Jesus Christ said, in Matthew 7:12, “So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.”

This is, in essence, a libertarian’s only charge.  All other freedoms are defined negatively.  The less the state tells its people what they cannot do, the more free they are.  Turns out, citizens whose state has minimal control over them have more control over their state; therefore, freedom begets democracy, and not the other way around.

Maintaining freedom in a society is difficult: governments around the world often devolve from democracy into a natural state of dictatorship, due to the “tyranny of the majority.”  As opposed to a dictatorship – where one identifiable individual takes the blame for the ills of a nation - in a democracy, everyone is to blame, and recovery takes much longer.  Unable to accept blame, a democracy often targets specific segments of society, as we’ve seen recently with the Occupy Wall Street movement and the London Riots.

America has experienced significant loss before – loss of separation of powers, rule of law, the respect for life, liberty, and property – but now, it’s different, as the crisis is more globalized, and I’m unsure we have the willpower to change course.  In the midst of a global insurrection, I believe the United States of America is leading the world’s recoil into a dictatorship, under the disguise of democracy.

What we sought at our nation’s conception was not a democracy, but a republic; what we had was a republic; it was bound together by the values prescribed in the Constitution.  These values made us supreme, and by relying upon our values, we could have weathered any storm, even when challenged by the mongrels of the world.

But we chose a different journey.

When the Roman Empire - a previous global democracy – fell to tyranny, the entire world plunged into two centuries of Dark Ages, due to not one, but many causes.  I will have two follow-up posts covering the two most prevalent reasons for the decline of Rome, and now, America:

1) Economic Collapse – a crippling debt and the debasing of the currency;
2) Incoherent Defense – a large military budget and the loss of military principle in warfare.

I believe America – and the world – is teetering on tyranny, and there is no use in denying the truth, for freedom depends on truth, and from the truth, we can regain our strength and restore a once-great nation.

“Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
~ John 8:32

Share on Facebook
Filed under Ideology
Nov 22, 2011

Discovering My Perspective

All of my past posts are archived below. Feel free to comment to any post by clicking the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.

I have no rights to the photos used herein. Most were found online through a simple Google search. If a copyright issue exists, please message me and I will eradicate the problem. Thank you!

My Twitterfeed

Follow @travisthornton on twitter.

Categories